Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Physics and Mathematics Series

Advanced search

Modeling the capacity of collection points for electronic household waste in cities

https://doi.org/10.29235/1561-2430-2022-58-1-120-128

Abstract

This paper presents guidelines for modeling the capacity of electronic household waste collection points. These points are used as infrastructure elements with a multi-stage logistic support scheme for the electronic waste disposal process. This paper includes theoretical and methodological information on the procedure for placing points of waste collection in cities using the processes of determining the parameters of waste accumulation, calculating the design capacity of warehouses at these points, and developing routes for the transportation of waste to the places of their disposal. We represent the dependence of the logistic support costs, including the costs of maintaining waste collection points, and waste disposal to utilization facilities, on the duration of the waste accumulation period. A mathematical model for optimizing the logistic support costs is developed, which takes into account the most important parameters of the waste disposal system, namely, the topology of the collection points, the intensity of waste accumulation, the configuration of the routes, and the vehicle carrying capacity. Using the example of the Vietnamese capital, the city of Hanoi, the required number of waste collection points is calculated, the volume of waste accumulation at each point is determined, the optimal period of waste accumulation, in which the total costs for logistic support for the disposal process will be minimal, is determined. Recommendations on the organization of waste transportation, depending on the actual level of filling the capacity of collection and accumulation points, are given.

About the Authors

D. V. Kapski
Belarusian National Technical University
Belarus

Denis V. Kapski – Dr. Sc. (Engineering), Dean of the Automotive and Tractor Faculty

65, Nezavisimosti Ave., 220013, Minsk 



O. N. Larin
Russian University of Transport
Russian Federation

Oleg N. Larin – Dr. Sc. (Engineering), Professor at the Department of Logistic Transport Systems and Technologies at the Institute of Management and Digital Technologies

9, b9, Obrazcov Str., 127994, Moscow 



Thi Thu Huong Nguyen
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation

Nguyen Thi Thu Huong – Postgraduate Student; Lecturer at the University of Transport Technology

36, Stremyanny Lane, 117997, Moscow

Hanoi, Vietnam 



References

1. Bartoleto A. P. Waste prevention policy and behaviour. New approaches to reducing waste generation and its environmental impacts. Routledge, 2015. Available at: https://www.book2look.com/embed/9781317815211

2. Waste prevention in Europe – policies, status and trends in reuse in 2017. EEA Report. 4/2018. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018. Available at: https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/sites/default/files/eea_report_waste_prevention_in_europe_2017_th-al-18-0008-en-n.pdf

3. Shittu O. S., Williams I. D., Shaw P. J. Global E-waste management: Can WEEE make a difference? A review of e-waste trends, legislation, contemporary issues and future challenges. Waste Management, 2021, vol. 120, pp. 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.016

4. Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal. UNEP/ BRS/2014/3. United Nations, Geneva, 1400778(E), 2014. Available at: https://www.basel.int/Portals/4/Basel%20Convention/docs/text/BaselConventionText-e.pdf

5. Ferreira B., Monedero J., Martí J. L., Aliaga C., Hortal M., López A. D. The Economic Aspects of Recycling. PostConsumer Waste Recycling and Optimal Production. London: IntechOpen, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5772/34133

6. The EIB in the Circular Economy. European Investment Bank, 2020. Available at: https://www.eib.org/attachments/thematic/circular_economy_en.pdf

7. Dobroselskyi M., Madleňák R. Model of waste transportation management in the conditions of a production company. Transportation Research Procedia, 2019, vol. 40, pр. 1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.143

8. Govindan K., Soleimani H., Kannan D. Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, vol. 240, no. 3, pp. 603–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012

9. Govindan K., Bouzon M. From a literature review to a multi-perspective framework for reverse logistics barriers and drivers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, vol. 187, рр. 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.040

10. Rau H., Budiman S., Monteiro Ch. Improving the sustainability of a reverse supply chain system under demand uncertainty by using postponement strategies. Waste Management, 2021, vol. 131, рр. 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.018

11. Islam Md. T., Huda N. Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)/E-waste: A comprehensive literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018, vol. 137, pp. 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.026

12. Elia V., Gnoni M. G., Tornese F. Improving logistic efficiency of WEEE collection through dynamic scheduling using simulation modeling. Waste Management, 2018, vol. 72, pp. 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.016

13. Gomes M., Barbosa-Povoa A., Novais A. Modelling a recovery network for WEEE: A case study in Portugal. Waste Management, 2011, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1645–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.02.023

14. Kubasakova I., Kubanova J. The Comparison of Implementation Items of Reverse Logistics in Terms of Chosen Companies in Europe and Slovakia. Transportation Research Procedia, 2021, vol. 53, рр. 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.02.022

15. Glemba K., Averyanov Y., Larin O. Theoretical Study of Improving the Safety of the “Operator, Machine, and Environment” System when Performing Transport Operations. SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety, 2018, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.4271/09-06-01-0001

16. Waste Management Practices: Literature Review. Dalhousie University, June 2011. Available at: https://cdn.dal.ca/content/dam/dalhousie/pdf/dept/sustainability/resources/publications-and-plans/waste/Waste%20Management%20Literature%20Review%20Final%20June%202011%20(1.49%20MB).pdf

17. Ho S. T., Tong D. Y. K., Ahmed E. M., Lee C. T. Factors Influencing Household Electronic Waste Recycling Intention. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, vol. 622–623, pp. 1686–1690. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.622-623.1686

18. Haron N. F., Sidique Sh. F., Radam A. Factors Influencing Household Electronic Waste (E-Waste) Recycling Participation. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 2018, pp. 1552–1557. Available at: http://www.tojdac.org/tojdac/VOLUME8-SPTMSPCL_files/tojdac_v080SSE208.pdf


Review

Views: 690


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1561-2430 (Print)
ISSN 2524-2415 (Online)